Where LLMs fail
They answer the prompt, not the decision
A stand-alone LLM can generate plausible analysis while leaving the real decision undefined, the criteria unstable and the unresolved tensions invisible.
Meridian — Decision Intelligence Layer
Structure for decisions that are too important to leave to instinct alone.
Meridian is a structured AI-assisted environment — built on my advisory practice — that helps advisors and leadership teams frame decisions, pressure-test assumptions and prepare stronger decision conversations. It is currently available through a limited early-access partner program.
Unlike a general-purpose LLM, Meridian holds a deliberate decision architecture across the full reasoning process: frame, objectives, alternatives, assumptions, trade-offs, evidence gaps and synthesis — keeping each element connected and visible throughout.
Decision context
What is the real decision?
Clarify the decision frame, given constraints, objectives, options and unresolved questions.
Reasoning challenge
Where is the logic weak?
Pressure-test assumptions, missing evidence, false certainty and trade-offs that are not yet explicit.
Synthesis
What should leaders discuss next?
Create a concise synthesis that supports better conversations, not automated answers.
The problem
Most strategic decisions are less structured than organisations admit.
They fail because the reasoning around the data is incomplete, political, rushed or poorly structured.
01
The real decision is often unclear.
Teams discuss solutions before agreeing on the decision frame, ownership, constraints and what success actually means.
02
Objectives get reduced to proxies.
Cost, speed, growth, risk and reputation are often treated separately, while the real value lies in understanding their trade-offs.
03
PowerPoint becomes the memory of the decision.
The logic, assumptions, discarded options and unresolved uncertainties disappear once the meeting moves on.
04
Stand-alone LLMs can make this worse.
A general chatbot can summarise, brainstorm or sound convincing, but it does not know whether the decision frame is complete, which assumptions are doing the work, where trade-offs are unresolved, or who remains accountable for the judgement.
What makes Meridian different
A decision-intelligence layer, not a stand-alone LLM.
Stand-alone LLMs are useful for language, summaries and idea generation, but they are weak at holding a decision structure over time. Meridian adds the missing layer: a deliberate reasoning architecture that keeps the frame, objectives, alternatives, assumptions, trade-offs, evidence gaps, tensions and synthesis connected.
Meridian differs
It keeps the decision architecture visible
Meridian anchors the work in context, objectives, options, constraints, assumptions, trade-offs, uncertainty, challenge and synthesis — so the reasoning can be reviewed instead of merely consumed.
Where LLMs fail
They collapse ambiguity too quickly
Generic copilots often smooth over disagreement, produce a neat recommendation and hide where evidence is thin, incentives conflict or leadership judgement is still required.
Meridian differs
It surfaces fragility and tension
Meridian is built to expose weak logic, competing objectives, brittle assumptions, missing evidence and unresolved pressure points before the decision is taken forward.
Where LLMs fail
They have no accountable memory
Chat threads do not naturally preserve why options were discarded, which assumptions changed, what was challenged or what still needs executive attention.
Meridian differs
It prepares a decision record
Meridian turns the reasoning journey into a structured synthesis that advisors, leadership teams and boards can revisit, challenge and own.
Link to my work
Connected to advisory practice, not overstated as magic.
Meridian reflects my work in decision support, planning, digital products and senior advisory conversations. It is a practical extension of that knowledge and experience: a way to scale structured reasoning, challenge and judgement without losing the human accountability that good decisions require.
01
For advisory work
Meridian can support structured intake, external challenge, decision review preparation and synthesis after workshops or interviews.
02
For decision-quality practitioners
It gives experienced facilitators a repeatable environment to test whether the decision frame is complete and robust.
03
For leadership teams
It creates a shared reference point for the quality of reasoning before a decision is taken to a board, steering committee or investment forum.
Early-access partner program
For selected advisors and serious decision environments.
Meridian is currently available through selected partner routes. The aim is to protect quality, learn from serious use cases, and make my decision-support experience available in a more structured and scalable form through practitioners who work with real strategic decisions.
Meridian Partner
For advisors who want to use Meridian early and help shape the product
For independent advisors, decision-quality practitioners and boutique strategy consultants who want to use Meridian in selected engagements while contributing practical feedback from real decision work.
- Up to 3 users per organisation.
- Early access for selected advisory or internal decision reviews.
- Includes onboarding and a structured feedback rhythm.
- Direct input into product learning, roadmap priorities and use-case validation.
- Commercial participation opportunities available where partners introduce Meridian into client work.
Commercial Package
For firms that want Meridian as part of their decision practice
For advisory firms that want to embed Meridian more structurally into their decision practice or client delivery model, with broader usage across recurring high-stakes engagements.
- Broader internal usage for selected practice teams.
- Suitable for multiple engagements, decision reviews or steering processes.
- Includes deeper onboarding, periodic product review and roadmap input.
- Designed for firms embedding Meridian into a broader decision practice or client delivery model.
- Commercial partnership, licensing or referral structures can be discussed for selected firms.
Corporate Package
For future institutional deployment after product stabilisation
A future route for corporate strategy, investment, transformation or governance teams that want Meridian as an internal decision-quality environment.
Lateravailable after product stabilisation
- Not currently offered as a standard package.
- Intended only after the product, onboarding, security and support model are mature enough.
- Could support recurring decision reviews, investment committees and strategic governance rhythms.
- For now, Meridian remains available through selected partner and commercial routes.
Meridian in practice
From unclear context to decision-ready synthesis.
Meridian supports the reasoning journey around a complex decision: first capturing the situation as it is, then structuring challenge around assumptions, alternatives, fragility, tension and synthesis, and finally preparing an executive synthesis that can be reviewed, externally challenged and shared.
01
Decision intake
A calm starting point for turning uploaded material into an analytical understanding of the decision — before the system starts reasoning.
02
Fragility lens
An exposure field that shows where the decision is most vulnerable — helping teams identify the points that need to be bounded before confidence can increase.
03
Tension lens
A pressure field that reveals where opposing truths pull against each other, making unresolved tensions explicit without reducing them to a simple trade-off.
04
Reasoning challenge
Meridian tests the strength of the decision logic across readiness, uncertainty, tensions and commitment — keeping the challenge tied to the decision-quality structure.
05
Synthesis report
Executive-level output that can be exported, shared and opened up for external challenge before it becomes part of the formal decision record.
Early access
For selected advisors and organisations.
Meridian is currently being shaped with a limited group of practitioners and organisations working on complex strategic decisions. The best starting point is a focused conversation about the decisions you support, how you currently structure reasoning, and whether a partner-program route makes sense.
Discuss Meridian
Based in The Netherlands. Engaging internationally.